MyTool blocks direct access to sensitive nested paths, but its formatter
still printed scalar fields for small config objects. That let
`my(action="check", key="web_config.search")` expose `api_key` in plain
text even though the docs promise sensitive sub-fields are protected.
This keeps the change narrow: sensitive nested config fields are omitted
from MyTool's formatted output, and regression coverage locks the
behavior in.
Constraint: Must preserve existing read-only inspection behavior for non-sensitive fields
Constraint: Keep scope limited to MyTool rather than introducing broader redaction plumbing
Rejected: Rework global context/tool redaction around MyTool | broader than needed for the leak path
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Reversibility: clean
Directive: If more nested config rendering is added later, filter sensitive field names at the formatter boundary as well as the path resolver
Tested: PYTHONPATH=$PWD pytest -q tests/agent/tools/test_self_tool.py /Users/jh0927/Workspace/nanobot-validation-artifacts-2026-04-18/test_my_tool_secret_leak_regression.py
Not-tested: Full repository test suite
Related: #3259
Add a built-in tool that lets the agent inspect and modify its own
runtime state (model, iterations, context window, etc.).
Key features:
- inspect: view current config, usage stats, and subagent status
- modify: adjust parameters at runtime (protected by type/range validation)
- Subagent observability: inspect running subagent tasks (phase,
iteration, tool events, errors) — subagents are no longer a black box
- Watchdog corrects out-of-bounds values on each iteration
- Enabled by default in read-only mode (self_modify: false)
- All changes are in-memory only; restart restores defaults
- Comprehensive test suite (90 tests)
Includes a self-awareness skill (always-on) with progressive disclosure:
SKILL.md for core rules, references/examples.md for detailed scenarios.
